Also, in my attempt at offering an explanation of the quote, I was trying to philosophically look at what it meant rather than find a philosophical meaning to the quote (if you see the difference I'm getting at). Even going back to your statements, you can objectively say there is subjectivity. Also, look at what would be the most plausible explanation of the quote by whoever created it, and I think my explanation of the quote is much closer to what they had in mind (though probably not my example -- and yes I realize that my comment was more example-based than explanation-based, except insofar as the example contributed to the explanation). Besides, going for the original meaning of the quote is more objective, while giving an explanation of what it means to you is more subjective, don't you think? ;)